Q11: Do we need the regional subcommittee?.Q9: Which group of users U4C must include?.Q8: To what extent should individual Wikimedia projects be allowed to decide how they enforce the UCoC?.Q7: How often should someone be allowed to appeal a UCoC violation decision?.Q6: Who should handle the appeals process?.Q5: What kinds of behavior or evidence would we want to see before granting an appeal?.Q4: When should someone be able to initiate an appeal for a UCoC violation.Q3: Should the U4C committee also decide individual cases or process appeals?.Q2: Escalation: What instance/body/judge is supposed to process them?.Q1: Escalation: Where do the complaints go?.The questions below will also be posted on the meta-wiki discussion page. We divided the open questions from the drafting committee into 12 questions to let participants easily understand which part of the enforcement draft that committee needs the comment. In this session, to accompany the request of the drafting committee, we exclusively covered the Open Questions from the Drafting committee as well as ratification. Total of 25 participants attended roundtable sessions. There were two sessions, first one at 03:00 UTC (Asia/Pacific friendly time zone) and second one at 15:00 UTC (Western/America friendly time zone). On September 18, 2021, Universal Code of Conduct facilitation team hosted the roundtable session to talk together about Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement draft guidelines review (EDGR). Summaries for enforcement draft guidelines review roundtables September 18 Roundtable
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |